Joint relay, subcarrier and power allocation for OFDMA-based femtocell networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Relaying in femtocell networks is a promising and economically viable option to reduce the co-channel interference while improving indoor coverage and the network capacity in the next generation wireless networks. However, efficient relay selection as well as subcarrier and power allocation are critical in such networks when multiple users and multiple relays are considered. In this paper, an optimal resource (relay, subcarrier and power) allocation algorithm for co-channel deployed orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA) based femtocell systems is proposed. The resource allocation problem is formulated as a joint relay, subcarrier and power allocation problem with the objective of maximizing the sum of the weighted rates of the femtocell system subject to protecting the macrocell network's communications. Due to the non-convex nature of the original resource allocation problem, we obtain an optimal solution for the original problem by solving a relaxed problem via dual decomposition. Simulation results demonstrate that our proposed resource allocation algorithm outperforms the resource allocation algorithms proposed in literature by achieving higher throughput at the expense of a slight increment of the system complexity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".