MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2030105539 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2595

The deep diffuse extragalactic radio sky at 1.75 GHz

2015· article· en· W2030105539 on OpenAlexaff
Tessa Vernstrom, R. P. Norris, D. Scott, J. V. Wall

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadio Astronomy Observations and Technology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsPoint sourceSource countsSkyDark matterTelescopeObservatoryAstronomyGalaxyOpticsRedshift

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a study of diffuse extragalactic radio emission at 1.75 GHz from part of the ELAIS-S1 (European Large Area Infrared Space Observatory Survey – South 1) field using the Australia Telescope Compact Array. The resulting mosaic is 2.46 deg2, with a roughly constant noise region of 0.61 deg2 used for analysis. The image has a beam size of 150 arcsec × 60 arcsec and instrumental 〈σn〉 = (52 ± 5) μJy beam−1. Using point-source models from the Australia Telescope Large Area Survey, we subtract the discrete emission in this field for S ≥ 150 μJy beam−1. Comparison of the source-subtracted probability distribution, or P(D), with the predicted distribution from unsubtracted discrete emission and noise, yields an excess of (76 ± 23) μJy beam−1. Taking this as an upper limit on any extended emission, we constrain several models of extended source counts, assuming Ωsource ≤ 2 arcmin. The best-fitting models yield temperatures of the radio background from extended emission of Tb = (10 ± 7) mK, giving an upper limit on the total temperature at 1.75 GHz of (73 ± 10) mK. Further modelling shows that our data are inconsistent with the reported excess temperature of ARCADE2 to a source-count limit of 1 μJy. Our new data close a loop-hole in the previous constraints, because of the possibility of extended emission being resolved out at higher resolution. Additionally, we look at a model of cluster halo emission and two dark matter particle annihilation source-count models, and discuss general constraints on any predicted counts from such sources. Finally, we report the derived integral count at 1.4 GHz using the deepest discrete count plus our new extended-emission limits, providing numbers that can be used for planning future ultradeep surveys.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.261
Threshold uncertainty score0.631

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietySame topicRadio Astronomy Observations and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207