Zur unblutigen Blutdruckmessung an Haustieren II. Normalwerte, veränderte Drucke und Meßpraxis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Zusammenfassung Nach der Darstellung von Normalwerten (syst. Druck 120, mittl. 95, diast. 75 mm Hg) folgt eine Übersicht von Krankheiten mit Hyper- und Hypotonien. Es wird besprochen, welche bei den Tierarten bekannt geworden sind. Vier registrierte Druckmessungen zeigen, wie Schwierigkeiten bei der Messung zu überwinden sind und welche Bedeutung der klinischen Blutdruckmessung auch in der Veterinärmedizin zukommt. Summary Bloodless blood pressure measurement in domestic animals II. Normal values, pressure changes and examples After demonstrating the normal values (systolic pressure 120, mean pressure 95, diastolic 75 mm. Hg) there follows a survey of diseases associated with hypertonia and hypotonia. The situation in different species is discussed. Four examples of pressure measurements in dogs are cited to show the difficulties that remain to be surmounted and the significance to be attached to clinical blood pressure measurement in veterinary medicine. Résumé Mesure de la pression sanguine non sanglante chez des animaux domestiques II. Valeurs normales, pressions variables et pratique de la mesure Les valeurs normales ayant été représentées (pression systolique 120, moyenne 95, diastolique 75 mm Hg), on présente un aperçu des maladies avec hyper- et hypotonie. On expose celles qui ont été reconnues chez les espèces animales. Quatre mesured de pression enrégistrées montrent quelles sont les difficultés à surmonter lors de la mesure et quelle est la signification de la mesure de la pression sanguine clinique en médecine vétérinaire. Resumen Sobre la medición incruenta de la presión sanguínea en animales domésticos II. Valores normales, presiones alteradas y práctica de mensura Tras exponer los valores normales (presión sistólica 120, media 95, diastólica 75 mm Hg), se ofrece una sinopsis de enfermedades con hiper e hipotonías. Se reseñan las que se conocen en las especies animales. Cuatro mediciones registradas de la presión señalan como se sortean las dificultades en la medición y qué significado le corresponde también a la medida de la presión sanguínea en la Medicina veterinaria.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".