Dark current mechanisms in stabilized amorphous selenium based n-i detectors for x-ray imaging applications
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The dark current behavior under operating bias is one of the important selection criteria for an x-ray photoconductor to be usable in a practical x-ray image detector. The authors have developed an analytical model for describing the transient and steady-state behavior of dark current in n-i-type amorphous selenium (a-Se) detectors by considering carrier injections from the metal contacts and thermally generated carriers. It has been found that the thermal generation current is almost two orders of magnitude smaller than the total steady-state dark current in n-i-type a-Se detectors. The main source of dark current is the injection of holes from the metal/n-layer interface which is described by the diffusion theory. The hole injection from the metal depends on the blocking layer (n-layer) thickness, the concentration of trap centers in the blocking layer, the characteristic carrier release time, and the effective barrier height. The fitting of the first principles model with the experimental results estimates the concentration of deep hole trap center in the n-layer, the trap depth from the valence band edge, and the effective barrier heights for the injecting carriers. The electron injection varies with the work function of the contact metal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it