Social status and children's behaviour: do ecological correlations reflect family‐level associations?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During the past 60 years, Geographers and Sociologists have approached the problem of mental illness from an ecological perspective, endeavouring to identify variables which may offer insight into the potential cause(s) of mental disturbance. Implicit in much of this research is an assumption that ecological correlates offer insight into processes which may be occurring at the level of the individual or family. Relatively little has been done, however, to assess the utility of the ecological approach in identifying potential individual/family‐level risk factors. This paper examines results from a mental health survey of children attending grades K through 4 in the most highly urbanised portion of Greater Victoria, British Columbia. Ecological correlations were used to assess the relationships between five social status indicator variables and the prevalence of problem behaviour within the sample at the census tract level. For the purposes of comparison, data collected in the survey were used to determine the degree of association between behavioural status and potential risk factors measured at the family‐level. Results for both types of analysis suggest a link between social status and children's mental health. However, differences apparent in the relationships between problem behaviour and variables at each scale reinforce the need for caution in the interpretation of ecological analyses. Pendant les 60 dernières années, les géographes et sociologues ont approché le problème de la maladie mentale d'une perspective écologique, essayant d'identifier les variables qui peuvent offrir un aperçu dans une (des) cause(s) potentielle(s) de trouble mental. Implicite dans beaucoup de cette recherche est une supposition que les corrélations écologiques offrent un aperçu dans les processus qui peuvent se produire au niveau de l'individu ou de la famille. Relativement peu a été fait, cependant, pour évaluer l'utilitaire de l'approche écologique en identifiant différents facteurs de risque potentiels d'un niveau individuel/famille. Get article examine des résultats d'une enquête de santé mentale des enfants aujardin d'enfants jusqu‘à la quatrieme année dans la partie la plus urbaine de “Greater Victoria”, Colombie Britannique. Des corrélations écologiques ont été employées pour évaluer les rapports entre cinq indicateurs variables de statut social et la prédominance du comportement problématique dans l’échantillon au niveau de région de recensement. Pour les huts de. la comparaison, des données rassemblées dans l'enquête ont été employées pour déterminer le degré d'association entre le statut de comportement et les facteurs de risque potentiel mesurés au niveau de famille. Les résultats pour les deux types d'analyse suggèrent un lien entre le statut social et la santé mentale des enfants. Cependant, les différences évidentes dans les rapports entre le comportement problématique et les variables à chaque échelle renforce le besom d'attention dans l'interprétation des analyses écologiques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".