MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2030152851 · doi:10.1074/jbc.m201240200

Role of Integrin-linked Kinase in Leukocyte Recruitment

2002· article· en· W2030152851 on OpenAlexaff
Erik B. Friedrich, Sumita Sinha, Ling Li, Shoukat Dedhar, Thomas Force, Anthony Rosenzweig, Robert E. Gerszten

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCell Adhesion Molecules Research
Canadian institutionsVancouver General HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
KeywordsCell biologyIntegrin-linked kinaseIntegrinIntegrin alpha MChemokineCell adhesionBiologyCell adhesion moleculeChemotaxisSignal transductionChemistryProtein kinase AKinaseImmunologyBiochemistryCellCyclin-dependent kinase 2InflammationReceptorFlow cytometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chemokines modulate leukocyte integrin avidity to coordinate adhesion and subsequent transendothelial migration, although the sequential signaling pathways involved remain poorly characterized. Here we show that integrin-linked kinase (ILK), a 59-kDa serine-threonine protein kinase that interacts principally with beta(1) integrins, is highly expressed in human mononuclear cells and is activated by exposure of leukocytes to the chemokine monocyte chemoattractant protein-1. Biochemical inhibitor studies show that chemokine-triggered activation of ILK is downstream of phosphoinositide 3-kinase. In functional assays under physiologically relevant flow conditions, overexpression of wild-type ILK in human monocytic cells diminishes beta(1) integrin/vascular cell adhesion molecule-1-dependent firm adhesion to human endothelial cells. These data implicate ILK in the dynamic signaling events involved in the regulation of leukocyte integrin avidity for endothelial substrates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological Chemistry→Same topicCell Adhesion Molecules Research→French-language works237,207→