Tyrosine Phosphorylation of the Well Packed EphrinB Cytoplasmic β-Hairpin for Reverse Signaling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tyrosine phosphorylation of the 22-residue cytoplasmic region of ephrinB induces its binding to the SH2 domain of Grb4, thus initiating reverse signaling pathways controlling cytoskeleton assembly and remodeling. Recently, the region corresponding to this 22-residue motif was demonstrated to adopt a well packed beta-hairpin structure with a high conformational stability in the unphosphorylated cytoplasmic subdomain. However, because the binding to Grb4 is phosphorylation-dependent and the hairpin contains three conserved tyrosine residues that may be phosphorylated, the key events remain unknown as to how tyrosine phosphorylation affects the structure of this well packed beta-hairpin and which phosphorylation site is relevant to SH2 domain binding. By characterizing the structural and binding properties of six 22-residue SH2 domain-binding motifs with different phosphorylated sites, the present study reveals that, as shown by circular dichroism and NMR, the unphosphorylated 22-residue motif adopts a well formed beta-hairpin structure in isolation from the ephrinB cytoplasmic subdomain. However, this beta-hairpin is radically abolished by tyrosine phosphorylation, regardless of the relative location and number of Tyr residues. Unexpectedly, the peptides with either Tyr304 or Tyr316 phosphorylated show high affinity binding to SH2 domain, whereas the peptide with Tyr311 phosphorylated has no detectable binding. This implies that ephrinB with Tyr311 phosphorylated might have a currently unidentified binding partner distinct from the Grb4 protein, because Tyr311 is known to be phosphorylated in vivo. Based on the results above, it is thus proposed that the disruption of the tight side-chain packing by tyrosine phosphorylation in the well structured region of a signaling protein may represent a general activation mechanism by which a cryptic binding site is disclosed for new protein-protein interactions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".