Lanthanum Gallium Bismuthide, LaGaBi<sub>2</sub>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ternary rare-earth gallium bismuthide LaGaBi(2) has been prepared through reaction of the elements. Its structure (Pearson symbol hP24, hexagonal, space group P6/mmm, Z = 6, a = 13.5483(4) A, c = 4.3937(1) A) contains columns of La(6) trigonal prisms centered by Bi atoms. These columns are surrounded by a framework consisting of three-atom-wide Bi ribbons and Ga(6) rings. Additional Bi atoms are sandwiched between pairs of Ga(6) rings. LaGaBi(2) is structurally closely related to La(13)Ga(8)Sb(21). A retrotheoretical analysis of the structure through extended Hückel band structure calculations suggests an interesting electronic situation in which strong multiple bonding in the Ga-Ga network coexists with weak hypervalent bonding in the Bi-Bi network and confirms the metallic behavior seen in electrical resistivity measurements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".