MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2030183864 · doi:10.4296/cwrj2702175

Distribution and Movement of Nitrate in Soils from Snowpack in a Stream Riparian Zone, Waterloo, Ontario

2002· article· en· W2030183864 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Harald von Waldow, C. Gainham, L. Landriault, Jonathan S. Price, Mark Stone

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSnowpackRiparian zoneHydrology (agriculture)Soil waterEnvironmental scienceNitrateGroundwaterSnowBiogeochemical cycleHyporheic zoneSurface waterSoil scienceGeologyEnvironmental chemistryEcologyChemistryGeomorphologyHabitatEnvironmental engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stream riparian zones are landscape features that retain nutrients and enhance water quality. However, little is known about winter controls on nutrient transport in riparian zones. In this study we examine the distribution and movement of nitrate (NO3−) between snowpack, underlying soils and groundwater in a riparian zone to quantify processes which control NO3− transport through seasonally-frozen surface soils. Soils and vegetation in buffer zones attenuate nitrate during the growing season. However, this ability is uncertain with vegetation senescence, and when soils freeze and seasonal snowcover can contain an important nitrate load and later release it to surface waters during melt. At our study site snowcover reached a maximum depth of 32 cm following the major snowfall event from Julian Day (JD) 41 to 47, 2000. During this event, the snow water equivalent (SWE) increased twofold to 4.7 cm. A melt event starting on JD 53 resulted in a SWE loss of 2 cm. Snowpack NO3− concentrations reached a maximum value of 1.4 mg L−1 and a maximum loading of 51.7 mg m−2. During the main melt event, snowpack loading reduced to 36.9 mg m−2 and concentrations of NO3− in the snow decreased to 0.55 mg L−1. Over the study period, groundwater NO3− concentrations were relatively constant near 0.25 mg L−1. However, evidence of mixing of groundwater with stream water is strongly suggested by higher NO3− concentrations in near-stream groundwater (0.75 mg L−1), which was under hydrostatic pressure caused by the stream ice-cover. No identifiable NO3− pulse was observed during the main snowmelt period because persistent soil frost promoted depression storage, overland flow and shallow throughflow. Our results indicate that overland flow and shallow throughflow were the likely pathways for NO3− export from this system. Clearly these processes cannot be ignored when quantifying snowpack NO3− through riparian buffers with frozen soils.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.128

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.165
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriquesSame topicSoil and Water Nutrient DynamicsFrench-language works237,207