Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy in Children Aged 5 to 9 Years With Cerebral Palsy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To examine the effectiveness of a modified form of constraint-induced movement therapy (mCIMT) in the context of a day camp model in 6 children aged 5-9 years with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy. METHODS: Before, 1 week after, and 3 months after 9 consecutive days of mCIMT, participants were assessed using the Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test (QUEST) and assessments of range of motion and grip strength. Caregiver perceptions were assessed using the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) and a parent questionnaire. RESULTS: Significant improvements were observed on the "grasps" and "protective extension" subsections of the QUEST after the intervention. Increased social function was also observed as measured by the PEDI. All improvements were maintained at the 3-month follow-up assessment. Analysis of individual participants yielded additional information on clinically significant improvements as a result of the mCIMT intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The day camp model of mCIMT was effective in inducing lasting and meaningful changes in the children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".