Premalignant Cervical Lesions Are Characterized by Dihydrofolate Reductase Gene Amplification and c-Myc Overexpression
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The c-Myc oncoprotein deregulation is associated with overall genomic instability and locus-specific genomic instability involving the dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) locus. This study analyzes c-Myc protein levels and the stability of the DHFR gene in cervical tissue biopsies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The stability of the DHFR gene was examined by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). c-Myc protein levels were evaluated using quantitative fluorescent immunohistochemistry. Forty-four cervical tissue biopsies were analyzed and included 33 preinvasive cervical lesions identified by histology, 14 samples were cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 1; 7 were CIN 2; and 12 were CIN 3. Eleven biopsies had negative histology. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: c-Myc protein levels were elevated in CIN 1, 2, and 3 (p = .02) biopsies. Concomitantly, DHFR gene amplification was detected in CIN 1, 2, and 3 (p = .0001). The degrees of DHFR gene amplification and of c-Myc protein levels were a measure of the progressive degree of the lesion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".