<i>Chlamydia pneumoniae</i>infection suppresses<i>Staphylococcus</i>enterotoxin B-induced proliferation associated with down-expression of CD25 in lymphocytes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chlamydia pneumoniae (Chlamydophila pneumoniae) infects lymphocytes and modulates their immune functions; this is critical in the development of chronic inflammatory diseases associated with this pathogen. Therefore, to clarify this immune modulation due to C. pneumoniae infection, the effect of this infection on the proliferation of human peripheral blood lymphocytes was examined. Lymphocytes were proliferated by stimulation with Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin B, and the cell number was increased up to 3 times the unstimulated lymphocyte number. Further, induction of CD25 expression was observed in 55.8% of lymphocytes. Infection with C. pneumoniae suppressed the proliferation of almost half the lymphocytes induced by stimulation with S. aureus enterotoxin B, and CD25 induction was inhibited in 64.7% of lymphocytes. Inhibition of CD25 expression was observed in both infected and uninfected lymphocytes in culture. However, the expression of VLA4 was not affected by C. pneumoniae infection. Furthermore, inhibition was observed only by infection with viable C. pneumoniae and not by the heat-killed bacteria. These results suggest that C. pneumoniae affects lymphocyte function by inhibiting proliferation and CD25 expression in response to immunological stimulation, possibly via humoral mediator(s).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".