Time, Temperature, and Concentration Dependence of Ricinelaidic Acid–Canola Oil Organogelation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Canola oil (CO) gels were formed using ricinelaidic acid (REA), a hydroxylated fatty acid, and the time, temperature, and concentration dependence of the resulting gel structure was studied using small‐deformation rheology, light microscopy, and powder X‐ray diffraction (XRD). Between 5 °C and 30 °C, REA concentration had a significant influence on gel elasticity ( P < 0.05), whereas temperature had a relatively lesser influence on gel rheology. Differences were observed in the scaling exponent of G ′ LVR with concentration above 20 °C, which were also correlated with significant differences in gelation time at 20 °C. However, the 5% gels at 5 °C, 20 °C, and 35 °C displayed similar microstructures and behaved like weak gels stabilized by junction zones. Most of the gels studied (i.e., the 2%, 3%, 4%, and 5% gels at 15 °C, 20 °C, and 25 °C) consisted of long, thin, fibrous REA strands, although at 25 °C, the 2% gel was characterized by more transient and circular entities. During 28 days’ storage, there were no apparent changes detected in gel microstructure by microscopy or XRD, despite increases in the gel's opacity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".