STRIDE 1: Effects of the Selective ETA Receptor Antagonist, Sitaxsentan Sodium, in a Patient Population with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension that meets Traditional Inclusion Criteria of Previous Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Trials
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sitaxsentan (SITAX; Thelin, Encysive Corporation, Bellaire, TX, U.S.A.) is a highly selective oral endothelin-A receptor antagonist. STRIDE-1, a 12-week randomized, doubleblind, placebo-controlled trial of sitaxsentan for pulmonary arterial hypertension showed significant benefit in 6-minute walk distance, functional class and hemodynamics. Pulmonary arterial hypertension clinical trials traditionally limit enrolment to class III/IV patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension or pulmonary arterial hypertension related to connective tissue disease, who have a baseline 6-minute walk distance of < 450 m. In contrast, STRIDE-1 included milder cases: class II patients, no baseline 6- minute walk cut-off, and congenital heart disease patients. We now present the STRIDE-1 subset who would have qualified under traditional inclusion criteria. The results were: change for placebo (mean +/- SE) vs change for sitaxsentan (mean +/- SE) vs treatment effect (mean), all statistically significant: 6-minute walk (m): -26 +/- 13, 39 +/- 10, 65; mean right atrial pressure (mmHg): 2.1 +/- 0.8, -1.2 +/- 0.5, -3.3; mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mmHg): 0.4 +/- 1.5, -4.7 +/- 1.5, -5.1; cardiac index (L/min per m): -0.09 +/- 0.09, 0.38 +/- 0.06, 0.47; pulmonary vascular resistance (dyne.s.cm): 85 +/- 60, -274 +/- 47, -359. A 45% improvement in functional class was seen in sitaxsentan-treated patients (P = 0.0005). Thus, in the STRIDE-1 subpopulation that met enrolment criteria of previous pulmonary arterial hypertension trials, improvement in efficacy parameters with sitaxsentan therapy was even greater than seen in the entire STRIDE-1 population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".