MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2030318021 · doi:10.1159/000046805

Multiple Auditory Steady-State Responses to AM and FM Stimuli

2001· article· en· W2030318021 on OpenAlexaff
M. Sasha John, Andrew Dimitrijevic, Patricia Van Roon, Terence W. Picton

Bibliographic record

VenueAudiology and Neurotology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsBaycrest HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersMedical Research Council
KeywordsAmplitudeFrequency modulationAmplitude modulationStimulus (psychology)Carrier signalFrequency responseFrequency deviationPhysicsAcousticsAudiologyOpticsRadio frequencyAutomatic frequency controlPsychologyComputer scienceTelecommunicationsMedicineElectrical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multiple auditory steady-state responses were recorded using tonal stimuli that were amplitude-modulated (AM), frequency-modulated (FM) or modulated simultaneously in both amplitude and frequency (mixed modulation or MM). When MM stimuli combined 100% AM and 25% FM (12.5% above and below the carrier frequency) and the maximum frequency occurred simultaneously with maximum amplitude, the MM response was one third larger than the simple AM response. This enhancement occurred at intensities between 50 and 30 dB SPL and at carrier frequencies between 500 and 4000 Hz. The AM and FM components of a MM stimulus generate independent responses that add together to give the MM response. Since AM responses generally occur with a slightly later phase delay than FM responses, the largest MM response is recorded when the maximum frequency of the MM stimulus occurs just after the maximum amplitude.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.779
Threshold uncertainty score0.461

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations97
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAudiology and NeurotologySame topicHearing Loss and RehabilitationFrench-language works237,207