Homo- and Heterobimetallic Precursor Catalysts for the Heck Reaction, and a Proposal for a General Catalytic Cooperativity Index
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Homo- (Pd2) and heterobimetallic (PtPd) complexes supported by a P,P-bridging, bis(P,N-chelating) coordination mode of the potentially hexadentate ligand 1,1-bis[di(o-N,N-dimethylanilinyl)phosphino]methane (dmapm) are effective catalyst precursors for the aerobic Heck coupling of iodobenzene and styrene at 100 °C in DMF/H2O solution containing K2CO3. This medium allows for trivial separation of the trans-stilbene product which precipitates after the reaction mixture is cooled. The bimetallic precursors are more active than predicted from the sum of the activities of complexes chosen to mimic their mono-metallic “half units,” suggesting some degree of intermetallic cooperativity during the reaction. A non-linear dependence of initial rate on catalyst concentration implies, however, that the complexes do not remain intact, and may be involved in dissociative equilibria with non-dmapm containing monometallic components that are more active species for the Heck coupling. The complexes are slowly degraded by oxidation at a phosphorus centre. A general index for quantifying the degree of intermetallic cooperativity during a catalytic cycle is proposed and its utility and limitations are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".