Rapid phthaloylation and succinylation of hemicelluloses by microwave irradiation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Rapid phthaloylation and succinylation of wheat straw hemicelluloses with phthaloyl dichloride (PdC) and succinyl chloride (SC) in N,N dimethylformamide/ lithium chloride (DMF/LiCl) system using N -bromosuccinimide (NBS) as a catalyst was achieved for only 5 minutes at 50 °C by microwave irradiation. The degree of substitution (DS) ranged between 0.43 and 1.47. The effect of the molar ratios of xylose units in hemicelluloses to phthaloyl dichloride or succinyl chloride on the degree of substitution was investigated. It was found that the reactivity of succinyl chloride was higher as compared to Phthaloyl dichloride under similar experimental conditions. 13 C NMR studies revealed that the esterification occurred at the C-3 and C-2 positions in the β-D-xylose units of hemicelluloses, but preferentially at C-3 position. However, it should be noted that microwave irradiation did result in more degradation of the macromolecular hemicelluloses than conventional heating technique as shown by a lower thermal stability of the hemicellulosic derivatives obtained by microwave irradiation than those obtained by conventional heating technique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".