Changes in bone fatigue resistance due to collagen degradation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Clinical tools for evaluating fracture risk, such as dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and quantitative ultrasound (QUS), focus on bone mineral and cannot detect changes in the collagen matrix that affect bone mechanical properties. However, the mechanical response tissue analyzer (MRTA) directly measures a whole bone mechanical property. The aims of our study were to investigate the changes in fatigue resistance after collagen degradation and to determine if clinical tools can detect changes in bone mechanical properties due to fatigue. Male and female emu tibiae were endocortically treated with 1 M KOH for 1-14 days and then either fatigued to failure or fatigued to induce stiffness loss without fracture. Partial fatigue testing caused a decrease in modulus measured by mechanical testing even when not treated with KOH, which was detected by MRTA. At high stresses, only KOH-treated samples had a lower fatigue resistance compared to untreated bones for both sexes. No differences were observed in fatigue behavior at low stresses for all groups. KOH treatment is hypothesized to have changed the collagen structure in situ and adversely affected the bone. Cyclic creep may be an important mechanism in the fast deterioration rate of KOH-treated bones, as creep is the major cause of fatigue failure for bones loaded at high stresses. Therefore, collagen degradation caused by KOH treatment may be responsible for the observed altered fatigue behavior at high stresses, since collagen is responsible for the creep behavior in bone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".