Bibliographic record
Abstract
The hok/sok toxin-antitoxin system of Escherichia coli plasmid R1 increases plasmid maintenance by killing plasmid-free daughter cells. The hok/sok locus specifies two RNAs: hok mRNA, which encodes a toxic transmembrane protein, and sok antisense RNA, which binds a complementary region in the hok mRNA and induces transcript degradation. During cell growth, the cis-encoded sok RNA inhibits expression of the Hok toxin. In plasmid-free segregants, the rapid decay of sok RNA relative to hok mRNA permits Hok translation, leading to cell death. This post-segregational killing mechanism relies upon the ability of the hok mRNA to adopt alternative structural configurations, which affect ease of translation and the susceptibility of the molecule to degradation. The full-length hok transcript is stable, highly structured and immune to ribosome and antisense RNA binding. Gradual 3' end processing produces dramatic structural rearrangements in the mRNA, which render the molecule translationally active and expose the sok RNA binding site. During transcription, premature ribosome and sok binding are prevented through the formation of transient metastable hairpins in the 5' end of the nascent transcript. Several hok mRNA paralogs have been identified in the genome of E. coli, and Hok protein orthologs found in the genomes of Enterobacteria. Using a combination of automated search and extensive manual editing, we compiled a multiple sequence alignment for the hok mRNA. All three experimentally validated hok mRNA structures are mapped onto this alignment, which has been submitted to the Rfam database for RNA families.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".