Biophysical Approaches to Entry Inhibitor Antivirals with a Broad Spectrum of Action
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Antivirals have traditionally been developed to act by biochemical principles targeting proteins, such as inhibition of enzymes or protein–protein interactions. This approach has resulted in 57 clinical antivirals or boosters, and multiple others under development. However, viral infection also requires specific unique biophysical activities from the lipids in the viral envelope. These biophysical activities could also be targeted with small molecules. Several phospholipids, for example, inhibit infectivity in model systems. Such knowledge had not been applied to antiviral development until recently. However, two families of small molecules that inhibit viral infectivity by biophysical mechanisms affecting the lipids of the virion envelope were independently identified in 2010. Although they have yet to prove strong antiviral activities in vivo, and their long-term toxicological profiles have yet to be characterized, they do provide proof-of-principle that small molecule ‘drug-like’ compounds can act by biophysical principles affecting the lipids of the virion envelope.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".