Strengthening precast-prestressed hollow core slabs to resist negative moments using carbon fibre reinforced polymer strips: an experimental investigation and a critical review of Canadian Standards Association S806-02
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Behaviour of precast-prestressed hollow core slabs has been extensively studied when these slabs are subjected to positive bending moments, a practical application typical of hollow core slabs. However, in many projects it may be required to have an overhanging part of the roof to act as a cantilever. In doing so, and using precast-prestressed hollow core slabs, the slabs would be subjected to negative moments, atypical for hollow core slabs. In this paper, the behaviour of precast-prestressed hollow core slabs is experimentally investigated when they are subjected to negative bending moments. A proposed strengthening detail to increase the negative moment resistance of hollow core slabs using bonded carbon fibre reinforced polymer (CFRP) strips is presented. The CFRP strips were bonded to the top side of full-scale precast-prestressed hollow core slabs in the negative moment zone in different configurations. In two of the tested slabs the bond between the prestressing strands and the concrete was initially broken (during casting of the slabs) in the negative moment zone. The slabs with the bonded CFRP strips were tested to failure and the load–deflection behaviour was recorded. The results of the tests are presented and the strength enhancement of the hollow core slabs using the proposed technique is reported. The increase in the negative moment resistance of the CFRP-bonded hollow core slabs experimentally determined is also compared with the CSA-S806-02 prediction for the moment resistance of concrete elements with bonded CFRP strips.Key words: carbon fibre reinforced polymer (CFRP) strips, hollow core slab, flexure strengthening, prestressed concrete, precast slabs, prestressing strands.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.016 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".