Management of sorafenib, sunitinib, and temsirolimus toxicity in metastatic renal cell carcinoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the common and serious toxicities associated with the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as sorafenib and sunitinib and mTOR inhibitor temsirolimus, and to outline the most recent toxicity management guidelines. RECENT FINDINGS: Common grade 3 or 4 side effects with sorafenib include lymphopenia (13%), hypophosphatemia (13%), elevated lipase (12%), hand-foot syndrome (6%), and mucositis/stomatitis (6%). Common grade 3 or 4 side effects with suntinib elevated lipase (16%), neutropenia (12%), lymphopenia (12%), hypertension (8%), and fatigue/asthenia (7%). As for temsirolimus, common grade 3 or 4 side effects consist of anemia (20%), hyperglycemia (11%), fatigue/asthenia (11%), dyspnea (9%), and hypophosphatemia (5%). Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is rare but occurred in sorafenib-exposed and sunitinb-exposed patients. Cardiovascular morbidity may also be observed in sorafenib-exposed and sunitinib-exposed patients. SUMMARY: Through preventive and therapeutic measures, these side effects can be effectively managed, without reducing the dose and, therefore, affecting the efficacy of the treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".