Towards improved clinical characterization of Leber congenital amaurosis: Neurological and systemic findings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) is the most severe form of inherited retinal dystrophy that presents in infancy. LCA is both clinically and genetically heterogeneous. The aim of our study was to clarify the clinical aspects of LCA and to contribute to improved characterization of the disorder. We studied 40 children affected by LCA (mean age at first observation: 19 months, range: 8-50 months), who underwent a comprehensive evaluation that included: neurophthalmological evaluation, electroretinogram (ERG), and visual evoked potentials (VEPs), general and neurological examinations, developmental assessment using scales for visually impaired children, neuroradiological examinations, hepatic and renal function and metabolic investigations, brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs), EEG, and hand radiographs. Analyses of known LCA genes are ongoing. The subjects are still being followed up at 6-/12-month intervals. All the subjects fulfilled De Laey's criteria for LCA. The neurological examination was abnormal in 31 cases (hypotonia, ataxia with/without associated cerebellar signs). Cognitive development was normal in 24 cases, borderline in five, and subnormal in 11. Mild and nonspecific alterations on MRI were present in seven cases, and "molar tooth" sign in four; all the others had a normal neuroradiological picture. Among the subjects presenting with neurological signs, a subgroup (13 patients) emerged that was characterized by systemic (skin, kidney, liver) involvement. Our data confirm that LCA is a heterogeneous entity that can present as an isolated ocular manifestation, or in association with neurological and systemic abnormalities and support the need for a multidisciplinary approach to this entity and for genotype-phenotype studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".