MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2030621178 · doi:10.1115/esda2012-82116

Reducing Thermal Conductivity of Ceramic Materials Through Alloying

2012· article· en· W2030621178 on OpenAlexaff
Xiao Huang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceYttria-stabilized zirconiaDopantThermal conductivityCeramicCubic zirconiaOxideSinteringMetalComposite materialSpark plasma sinteringIonic conductivityChemical engineeringMetallurgyDopingElectrolyteChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For gas turbines and advanced nuclear power reactors, ceramic materials are used to provide thermal insulation to metallic components. Reducing the thermal conductivity of these ceramic materials allows further decrease in either metal surface temperature or thickness of the insulating materials. In this paper, our past research on the effects of oxide dopants is summarized with a focus on thermal properties. Metal oxides of different valence, ionic radius, and mass were incorporated into yttria partially stabilized zirconia (7 wt% Y2O3-ZrO2) using mechanical alloying process. The powder blends were consolidated using sintering and plasma spraying. The oxides investigated included trivalent Yb2O3, Sc2O3 and Cr2O3, tetravalent CeO2 and TiO2, and pentavalent Nb2O5 and Ta2O5. While all oxides provided improvement to thermal conductivity reduction, the most significant effect on reducing the thermal conductivity of 7YSZ was found by using trivalent oxides. Furthermore, the effect of dopant was also heavily influenced by the molar percentage of dopants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel CellsFrench-language works237,207