MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2030624679 · doi:10.1061/40766(174)50

Open-Standards Radio Based Train Control Proven for APMs

2005· article· en· W2030624679 on OpenAlexaff
David M. Dimmer

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRailway Systems and Energy Efficiency
Canadian institutionsTransport Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBandwidth (computing)MonorailComputer scienceControl systemTrainEngineeringTelecommunicationsComputer networkElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the opening of the Las Vegas Monorail, the first installation of an open standards based radio train control system is in operation. The architecture of the Las Vegas Monorail train control system will be presented, and the numerous benefits of this type of system as compared to conventional track circuit or inductive loop based control systems will be examined with an emphasis on flexibility, and cost reduction. Using the IEEE 802.3 open standard for LAN based communication, and the IEEE 802.11 standard for the wayside to carborne link, the installation in Las Vegas has proven the viability and benefits of basing a train control system on open standards. An analysis of the success of the first six months of operation will be presented. By specifying an IEEE 802.3 standard interface between the train control subsystems and the communication system and using the Internet Protocol as the basis for all messaging, the layered architecture of the train control system eliminates its dependence upon a specific radio technology. The benefits of this concept will be examined. The IEEE 802.11 radios in use today provide a significantly expanded communication bandwidth, as compared to previous generation APM control systems. The benefits this added bandwidth brings to train control applications will be examined. In addition, an analysis will be made of the available unused bandwidth in the train control network for other applications such as carborne and remote wayside CCTV, enhanced diagnostics, and passenger announcement applications. Additional APM projects under development, which are using this technology will be discussed, with an analysis of their differences from the Las Vegas monorail.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score0.390

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRailway Systems and Energy EfficiencyFrench-language works237,207