Drugs with Estrogen-like Potency and Brain Activity Potential Therapeutic Application for the CNS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Numerous reports, ranging from molecular investigations to clinical studies, demonstrate the potency of estrogens to modulate brain function and their implications in schizophrenia and depression. Alterations of dopaminergic, cholinergic, GABAergic, glutamatergic and serotonergic neurotransmission through estrogen-mediated mechanisms have been consistently established. Moreover, studies using in vivo and in vitro models as well as epidemiological data suggest that estrogens provide neuroprotection of central nervous system (CNS) cells implicated in the etiology of neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimers (AD) and Parkinsons (PD) diseases. Numerous genomic or non-genomic mechanisms of actions of estrogens in the brain have been documented implicating classical nuclear estrogen receptors as well as possible estrogen membrane receptors, antioxidant activity of steroids, their effect on fluidity as well as on antiapoptotic proteins and growth factors. Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) have estrogenic and/or antiestrogenic activity depending on the target tissue. Hence, SERMs have the same beneficial effect as estrogen in skeleton and cardiovascular systems but act as antagonists in breast and uterus. The finding of beneficial side effects of SERMs in the CNS might improve their risk-benefit ratio in traditional indications. In this review, we will survey schizophrenia and depression as examples of mental diseases and AD and PD as neurodegenerative diseases. We will review brain effects of estrogens, steroids possibly acting as pro-drugs of estrogens such as testosterone and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and present novel findings with SERMs. Drugs with estrogen activity in the brain may have therapeutic potential either by modulating brain neurotransmitter transmission or through neuroprotective activity. Keywords: Estrogen, Brain activity, CNS, Schizophrenia, Depression, Dopaminergic, Cholinergic, GABAergic, Glutamatergic, Serotonergic, Neurotransmission, Central nervous system, Alzheimers AD, Selective estrogen receptor modulators, Peripheral activities, Steroidal estrogens, 17beta estradiol, Dehydroepiandrosterone, Tamoxifen, Taloxifene, Triphenylethylenes, Benzothiphenes, Nerve growth factors NGF, Monomine oxidase
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".