Development and resistance of a biofilm in a planar fracture during biostimulation, starvation, and varying flow conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Investigations of biofilms in a planar fracture are required to develop a biobarrier concept in aquifers. A glass-fracture apparatus was designed to monitor a biofilm under three phases: biostimulation, starvation, and increased flow. Direct observations were performed using a light probe whereas indirect indications were obtained by enumerating planktonic bacteria, monitoring the oxidation–reduction potential (ORP), and interpreting tracer experiments using an analytical model for two-dimensional advection-dispersion. Biofilm clusters developed along the flow lines before extending to a fully-connected biofilm, covering 500 cm 2 after 50 d. The starvation phase favoured bacterial attachment at first followed by detachment, which was accentuated by increases in groundwater velocity. The ORP declined over the three experimental phases and was significantly related to the distance from the biostimulation zone. The modeling suggested that an increase in transverse dispersion within the fracture only occurs during the biostimulation phase. Key words: fractured rock, groundwater flow, biofilms, biobarriers, advection–dispersion model, biostimulation, starvation, oxidation–reduction potential.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".