MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2030655272 · doi:10.1042/bj20050792

Poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase is a component of the FMRP-associated messenger ribonucleoparticles

2005· article· en· W2030655272 on OpenAlexafffund
Jean‐Philippe Gagné, Marie-Ève Bonicalzi, Pierre Gagné, Marie-Ève Ouellet, Michael J. Hendzel, Guy G. Poirier

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemical Journal · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPARP inhibition in cancer therapy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaWilfrid Laurier UniversityUniversité Laval
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsPoly ADP ribose polymeraseContext (archaeology)Messenger RNAPolymeraseTranscription (linguistics)Second messenger systemEnzymeBiochemistryBiologyTranslation (biology)ChemistryCell biologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PARG [poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase] is the only known enzyme that catalyses the hydrolysis of poly(ADP-ribose), a branched polymer that is synthesized by the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase family of enzymes. Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation is a transient post-translational modification that alters the functions of the acceptor proteins. It has mostly been studied in the context of DNA-damage signalling or DNA transaction events, such as replication and transcription reactions. Growing evidence now suggests that poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation could have a much broader impact on cellular functions. To elucidate the roles that could be played by PARG, we performed a proteomic identification of PARG-interacting proteins by mass spectrometric analysis of PARG pulled-down proteins. In the present paper, we report that PARG is resident in FMRP (Fragile-X mental retardation protein)-associated messenger ribonucleoparticles complexes. The localization of PARG in these complexes, which are components of the translation machinery, was confirmed by sedimentation and microscopy analysis. A functional link between poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation modulation and FMRP-associated ribonucleoparticle complexes are discussed in a context of translational regulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.846

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemical JournalSame topicPARP inhibition in cancer therapyFrench-language works237,207