Identification of Sequences in Apolipoprotein(a) that Maintain Its Closed Conformation: A Novel Role for Apo(a) Isoform Size in Determining the Efficiency of Covalent Lp(a) Formation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have previously demonstrated that, in the presence of the lysine analogue epsilon-aminocaproic acid, apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] undergoes a conformational change from a closed to an open structure that is characterized by a change in tryptophan fluorescence, an increase in the radius of gyration, an alteration of domain stability, and an enhancement in the efficiency of covalent lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] formation. In the present study, to identify sequences within apo(a) that maintain its closed conformation, we used epsilon-aminocaproic acid to probe the conformational status of a variety of recombinant apo(a) isoforms using analytical ultracentrifugation, differential scanning calorimetry, intrinsic fluorescence, and in vitro covalent Lp(a) formation assays. We observed that the closed conformation of apo(a) is maintained by intramolecular interaction(s) between sequences within the amino- and carboxyl-terminal halves of the molecule. Using site-directed mutagenesis, we have identified the strong lysine-binding site present within apo(a) kringle IV type 10 as an important site within the C-terminal half of the molecule, which is involved in maintaining the closed conformation of apo(a). Apo(a) exhibits marked isoform size heterogeneity because of the presence of varying numbers of copies of the kringle IV type-2 domain located within the amino-terminal half of the molecule. Using recombinant apo(a) species containing either 1, 3, or 8 copies of kringle IV type 2, we observed that, while apo(a) isoform size does not alter the affinity of apo(a) for low-density lipoprotein, it affects the conformational status of the protein and therefore influences the efficiency of covalent Lp(a) assembly. The inverse relationship between apo(a) isoform size and the efficiency of covalent Lp(a) formation that we report in vitro may contribute to the inverse relationship between apo(a) isoform size and plasma Lp(a) concentrations that has been observed in vivo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".