Physiotherapy Extended-Role Practitioner for Individuals with Hip and Knee Arthritis: Patient Perspectives of a Rural/Urban Partnership
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To explore the perspectives of people with hip and knee arthritis regarding a physiotherapy extended-role practitioner (ERP) model of care in a rural setting. METHOD: Using semi-structured interviews, a qualitative descriptive case study was undertaken with 13 participants from a rural family practice located in the province of Ontario, Canada, who had all been assessed by an ERP. Transcribed interviews were analyzed for emergent themes. RESULTS: Three main themes were identified: (1) timely access to care, (2) distance as a factor in seeking care, and (3) perceptions of the ERP model of care. CONCLUSIONS: Participants reported many positive experiences with the physiotherapy ERP rural model. Processes related to minimizing travel required to access care are important for those in rural communities. An ERP model of care offers competent care that includes musculoskeletal diagnosis as well as time for educating patients and addressing questions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".