MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2030725105 · doi:10.1080/00039420410001667494

Nutrient supply to dairy cows from processed white lupines

2004· article· en· W2030725105 on OpenAlex
Peiqiang Yu, AR Egan, B. J. Leury, J. J. McKinnon, D. A. Christensen

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives of Animal Nutrition · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRumenNutrientAnimal scienceDairy cattleChemistryOmasumLarge whiteHigh proteinFood scienceAbomasumBiologyAgronomyFermentationEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this study was to compare the DVE/OEB system (DVE = truly absorbed protein in the small intestine; OEB = degraded protein balance (DPB) in Dutch) and the NRC-2001 model in the prediction of supply of protein to dairy cows from processed white lupines (Lupinus albus L.). Comparisons were made in terms of (1) ruminally synthesized microbial CP, (2) truly absorbed protein in the small intestine, and (3) degraded protein balance. In addition, the systematic investigation of roasting of the white lupines at various temperatures (110, 130, or 150 degrees C) and times (15, 30 or 45 min) on manipulation of digestive behaviour and the potential nutrient supply to dairy cows were also carried out, to obtain information on best processing conditions as intestinal protein sources (to achieve target values for potential high net absorbable protein in the small intestine while holding any N loss in the rumen to a low level). The results showed that the predicted values from the DVE/OEB system and the NRC-2001 model had significant correlations with high R ( > 0.83) values. However, using the DVE/OEB system, the overall average microbial protein supply based on available energy was 11% higher and the truly absorbed protein in the small intestine was 7% higher than that predicted by the NRC-2001 model. The difference was also found in the prediction of the degraded protein balances (DPB), which was 8% higher based on data from the NRC-2001 model. These differences are due to considerably different factors used in calculations in the two models, although both are based on similar principles. This indicates that a further refinement is needed for a modern protein evaluation and prediction system. In addition, this study showed that the roasting at higher temperature and time was effective in shifting protein degradation from rumen to intestines and it increased the DVE or MP values without reaching the negative degraded protein balance. The processing at 15 degrees C for 30 or 45 min might be the best treatments for white lupine due to its higher DVE and MP values and the very low DPB values.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.729
Threshold uncertainty score0.255

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it