MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2030817772 · doi:10.1359/jbmr.060915

Co-Treatment of PTH With Osteoprotegerin or Alendronate Increases Its Anabolic Effect on the Skeleton of Oophorectomized Mice

2006· article· en· W2030817772 on OpenAlexafffund
Rana Samadfam, Qingwen Xia, David Goltzman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Bone and Mineral Research · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMcGill UniversityAmgen
KeywordsOsteoprotegerinMedicineInternal medicineEndocrinologyAnabolismOsteoporosisOsteocalcinBone remodelingParathyroid hormoneFemurAlkaline phosphataseActivator (genetics)ChemistrySurgeryCalciumReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

UNLABELLED: We examined the effects of 60 days of co-treatment of PTH with either OPG or alendronate in oophorectomized mice. Compared with PTH alone, co-treatment of PTH with either of these two mechanistically distinct anti-catabolics improved bone volume, mechanical strength, and appendicular and axial mineralization and prolonged the beneficial effect of PTH on BMD. INTRODUCTION: Conflicting evidence exists as to whether the anabolic effect of PTH is inhibited by the action of anti-catabolics. To examine this issue, we assessed the effects of alendronate and osteoprotegerin (OPG), two anti-catabolics with different modes of action, on the anabolic activity of PTH(1-34) in the skeleton of 4-month-old oophorectomized mice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mice treated with vehicle alone (PBS), alendronate alone (100 microg/kg/week), OPG alone (10 mg/kg twice a week), or PTH alone (80 microg/kg/day) were compared with each other and with animals administered PTH plus alendronate or PTH plus OPG. We assessed lumbar spine and femoral BMD at 0, 30, and 60 days. Contact radiography, histology, and histomorphometry, three-point bending assay of the femur, and serum osteocalcin and TRACP5b assays were performed at 2 months. RESULTS: Although alendronate and OPG each suppressed bone turnover, at the doses used, this was more profound with OPG. Increases in lumbar spine and femoral BMD and in trabecular bone volume were at least as great with OPG as with alendronate, and mechanical indices of femoral bone strength improved only with OPG. Both produced a plateau in spine and femoral BMD increases by 30 days. Co-treatment of PTH with each anti-catabolic produced additive increases in BMD in the femur and supra-additive increases in the lumbar spine with no plateau effects. Neither anti-catabolic impeded the PTH-induced increase in bone volume or the increase in mechanical strength of the femur. CONCLUSIONS: These studies show that the highly potent anti-catabolic OPG can produce dramatic increases in BMD and bone strength; that the temporal pattern of activity of bone formation and resorption modulators may have major influence on net skeletal accrual; and that, depending on timing, inhibition of osteoclastic activity may markedly augment the anabolic action of PTH.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations79
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Bone and Mineral ResearchSame topicBone health and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207