Efficacy of pentasaccharide on a prethrombosis model based on a calibrated stasis by the increase in up-stream venous pressure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
On a previous model using Wessler's principle in the rat, we have demonstrated that a partial ligature of the inferior vena cava leading to a 40% increase in up-stream venous pressure was thrombogenic only in association with the infusion of low dose of thromboplastin (90 microg/kg). In these thrombogenic conditions, the infusion of pentasaccharide (Arixtra, fondaparinux) should lead to a strong inhibition of thrombus formation. Therefore, we performed on five groups of 10 rats: stasis alone (group S) with a 40% increase in up-stream venous pressure; stasis and thromboplastin (group ST90); and stasis, thromboplastin and pentasaccharide (groups SPT50, SPT100 and SPT250) at three different dosages (50, 100 and 250 microg/kg). The efficacy of pentasaccharide was measured according to the variations in up-stream venous pressure, thrombus weight and thrombin-antithrombin complexes levels. Only 250 microl/kg pentasaccharide significantly reduced the thrombus weight in comparison with group ST90 (5 mg versus 23.8 mg, P = 0.01) but it was not sufficient to induce a return to the basic state (5 mg versus 0.2 mg in group S, P = 0.049). Thrombin-antithrombin complex levels measured at the end of the experiment were significantly reduced in comparison with group ST90 (16.7 versus 57.8 mg, P = 0.01) and were not statistically different from group S (16.1 versus 16.6 mg, P = 0.65). In conclusion, in a very borderline model toward thrombogenesis, pentasaccharide was able to reduce thrombus weight and abolished biological hypercoagulability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".