Trends in Age Disparities Between Younger and Middle-Age Adults Among Reported Rates of Chlamydia, Gonorrhea, and Infectious Syphilis Infections in Canada: Findings From 1997 to 2007
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The objective was to determine trends in age disparities between reported rates of chlamydia, gonorrhea, and infectious syphilis among younger versus middle-age Canadians. METHODS: We examined age- and sex-specific reported rates of chlamydia, gonorrhea, and infectious syphilis between 1997 and 2007. Sexually transmitted infection (STI) rates in the younger age group (15-29 years) were compared to the middle-age group (40-59 years) over the 11-year period. We used Poisson regression to examine trends in age-specific (younger:middle-age) rate ratios. RESULTS: Between 1997 and 2007, both the number and rate of reported cases increased for all 3 nationally notifiable STIs. Although chlamydia and gonorrhea rates continued to be higher among younger adults, rates of all 3 STIs increased more dramatically among middle-age adults. Between 1997 and 2007, chlamydia rates increased by 86.8% among adults aged 15 to 29 (P <0.0001) and 165.9% among adults 40- to 59-years-old (P <0.0001). The corresponding increases for gonorrhea were 133.3% (P <0.0001) and 210.2% (P <0.0001) respectively. Infectious syphilis rates increased 5-fold among younger adults compared to an increase of 11-fold among middle-age adults (P <0.0001) since 1997. The reported rate ratios (younger:middle-age) decreased over time for chlamydia (P <0.0001), gonorrhea (P <0.0001), and syphilis (P = 0.005). Males were disproportionately represented among reported chlamydia, gonorrhea, and infectious syphilis cases, constituting 59.8%, 87.6%, and 93.0% of middle-age adult cases, respectively, in 2007. CONCLUSIONS: Middle-age adults may be increasingly affected by chlamydia, gonorrhea and infectious syphilis. There is a need for sexual health information targeting Canada's middle-age adults and their health care providers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".