Heat-Treated Fe/N/C Catalysts for O<sub>2</sub> Electroreduction: Are Active Sites Hosted in Micropores?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Limited availability of platinum is a potential threat to fuel cell commercialization. Since the 1970s, alternative catalysts to the electrochemical reduction of oxygen have been obtained from heat treatment at T > 600 degrees C of carbon with a non-noble metal and a source of nitrogen atoms. However, the process by which the heat treatment activates these materials remains an open question. Here, we report that the activation process of carbon black and iron acetate heat-treated in NH(3) comprises three consecutive steps: (i) incorporation of nitrogen atoms in the carbon, (ii) micropore formation through reaction between carbon and ammonia, and (iii) completion of active sites in the micropores by reaction of iron with ammonia. Step (ii) is the slowest. Moreover, the microporous surface per mass of catalyst controls the macroscopic activity when enough nitrogen atoms are incorporated in the structure of the carbon support. These facts should help in determining the structure of the active sites and in identifying methods to increase the site density of such catalysts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".