Proteomic analysis of Clostridium acetobutylicumin butanol production from lignocellulosic biomass
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Plant biomass is an abundant and renewable source of energy rich carbohydrates that can be efficiently converted by microbes into biofuels. Butanol is considered as a second generation biofuel when it is produced from lignocellulosic biomass comprising of agricultural and garden wastes that does not compete with the food supplies. Clostridium acetobutylicum is a gram positive, spore forming, obligately anaerobic bacteria capable of converting different sugars from lignocellulosic biomass to butanol through acetone – butanol – ethanol (ABE) fermentation process. However, the production of butanol from ABE fermentation process is not economically viable and studies have been performed to understand the utilization of lignocellulosic biomass and regulation of butanol production to improve butanol productivity. Successful industrial butanol production process through ABE fermentation requires complete understanding of the C .acetobutylicum. Shotgun proteomics provides a direct approach to study the whole proteome of an organism at molecular level in depth. Therefore, this paper focuses on shotgun proteomic profiling of C. acetobutylicum ATCC 824 from butanol fermentation process, elucidating the molecular functional mechanisms of C.acetobutylicum in butanol production.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".