MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2031066666 · doi:10.2118/137427-ms

Fully-Coupled Wellbore Design and Optimization for Thermal Operations

2010· article· en· W2031066666 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Unconventional Resources and International Petroleum Conference · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWellborePetroleum engineeringCompletion (oil and gas wells)Steam injectionSteam-assisted gravity drainageEngineeringProcess (computing)Computer scienceOil sandsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) is a widely used enhanced oil recovery process applied in Canadian oil sands projects. Operators of SAGD projects have long been aware that many factors such as near wellbore geology, tubular sizes, lengths, and the allocation of fluid rates between tubulars in multi-string completions, can significantly impact the effectiveness of well and well- pair operations. The interaction of well components within these complex wells and the reservoir can impact the economic and technical success of the entire project either positively or negatively, suggesting that a means of optimizing this interaction that couples wellbore effects with the reservoir is required. Simulation studies were carried out to investigate the impact of wellbore design optimization on the well's performance. Reservoir simulation was used as a tool to evaluate the advantages derived from the optimization of wellbore and tubular design for thermal projects using a new fully coupled reservoir-wellbore modeling approach linked to an optimization algorithm. This paper presents results that cover important aspects such as the impact of geological heterogeneity on wellbore design; the optimization of length and positioning of multiple tubular strings within a liner for both injection and production wells; and the optimization of the allocation of injected steam between multiple tubing strings. The results indicate positioning of tubulars in a multiple tubing completion SAGD well pair have a significant impact on the steam chamber growth, productivity, SOR and ultimately on NPV. This paper presents results of two optimization cases. The base case wellbore completion had two tubing strings, the short tubing string was landed at the heel while the long tubing string was landed at the toe of the horizontal SAGD well pair. First optimization was performed by changing the length/placement of tubing strings in the injector and the producer. Optimization of tubing placement increased the NPV of the well pair from 16.3 M$ to 20.7 M$ over 8 years. The Second optimization study was performed including the tubing placement similar to the previous case along with the SAGD operating strategy in terms of steam injection rate that was allowed to change every two years. In this case the NPV was optimized from 16.3 M$ to 25.79 M$ over 8 yrs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.392
Threshold uncertainty score0.572

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it