Biochemical Evaluation of Patients with Active Acromegaly and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Efficacy and Safety of the Galanin Test
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The oral glucose tolerance test, which is considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of active acromegaly, should not be performed in the presence of basal hyperglycemia. Moreover, false-positive responses may occur in patients with diabetes mellitus. Galanin has previously been demonstrated to induce paradoxical inhibition of growth hormone (GH) secretion in most patients with active acromegaly. In this study, we assessed GH response to galanin infusion in a series of 17 consecutive patients with active acromegaly, 7 of whom had coexistent type 2 diabetes mellitus and 10 were without either diabetes mellitus or impaired tolerance to glucose. 6 acromegalic patients with diabetes mellitus (85.7%) and 7 without diabetes (70.0%) showed a decrease in serum GH values during galanin infusion (chi2 0.9; p = 0.6). The GH nadir occurred at a comparable time in the two groups of acromegalic patients. Moreover, the two groups showed no significant difference (p = 0.45) in DeltaGH during galanin infusion. Galanin infusion did not induce any significant change in plasma glucose levels in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients with acromegaly. The results of our study provide evidence that the galanin test may be of value for the diagnosis of acromegaly in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".