MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2031211590 · doi:10.1021/bi060209a

Thermodynamics of the Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein RGG Box Interactions with G Quartet Forming RNA

2006· article· en· W2031211590 on OpenAlexaff
Kimberly J. Zanotti, Patrick E. Lackey, Genevieve L. Evans, Mihaela‐Rita Mihailescu

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Canadian institutionsAcadia University
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesCarnegie Mellon University
KeywordsFMR1RNAFragile X syndromeRNA-binding proteinTrinucleotide repeat expansionGene silencingChemistryGeneticsGeneBiologyFragile xBiophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fragile X syndrome, the most common form of inherited mental retardation, is the result of an unstable expansion of a CGG trinucleotide repeat in the 5' UTR of the fragile X mental retardation-1 (FMR1) gene. The abnormal hypermethylation of the expanded CGG repeats causes the transcriptional silencing of the FMR1 gene and, consequently, the loss of the fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP). FMRP is an RNA binding protein that binds to G quartet forming RNA using its RGG box motif. In this study we have performed a thermodynamic analysis of the interactions between the FMRP RGG box domain and Sc1, an RNA molecule which had been previously shown to be bound with high affinity by both the full-length FMRP and by its RGG box domain. We have determined that the association between the FMRP RGG box and Sc1 RNA is dominated by hydrophobic and hydrogen bond interactions, with minor contributions from electrostatic interactions, and that the FMRP RGG box binding increases the stability of the G quartet RNA structure significantly. Interestingly, we found that the G quartet recognition is necessary but not sufficient for the FMRP RGG box binding to this RNA target, indicating that additional interactions of the peptide, possibly with the stem and/or stem-G quartet junction region, are required. Our results also indicate that the G quartet RNA recognition is not a general feature of the RGG box motif but rather carries some sequence, protein and/or RNA, specificity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.353

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations61
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistrySame topicGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersFrench-language works237,207