Rapid female multiple mating in red flour beetles (<i>Tribolium castaneum</i>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many female insects mate with multiple males within a single fertile period despite costs such as expenditure of energy and time and contraction of sexually transmitted diseases. In the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum, females remate with different males within minutes of the first copulation. If rapid multiple mating is adaptive then multiply mated females should have higher fitness than singly mated females. In this study, we determined the remating frequency of female beetles, characterized female mating behavior, and examined the fitness consequences of female multiple mating. We found that female T. castaneum mated, on average, with 46 nonvirgin males within a 1-h observation period. The number of males present in a mating arena did not significantly affect copulation frequency or the intermating interval. However, number of males present significantly affected the length of a single copula as a result of disturbance by rival males when more males were present. Female mating with multiple males in 24 h did not significantly improve egg production, F 1 -adult production, egg-to-adult viability, fertility retention, and female survivorship. Thus, multiple mating did not enhance long-term female fitness. Polyandrous mating behavior may have evolved through other mechanisms such as fertility assurance and increased offspring genetic diversity or fitness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".