Effects of Host, Inoculum Concentration, Wetness Duration, Growth Stage, and Temperature on Anthracnose of Lentil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of concentration of conidia, duration of the wetness period, plant growth stage, and temperature on the development of anthracnose (Colletotrichum truncatum) on lentil (Lens culinaris) were assessed in growth-chamber and greenhouse studies using cv. Indianhead and line 458-57, which have partial resistance, and susceptible cv. Eston. Each genotype was assessed for incubation period (IP), latent period (LP), number of lesions (LN) per stem, and disease severity (DS). Both IP and LP decreased linearly with increasing conidial concentration, wetness duration, and temperature. Both IP and LP also became progressively shorter as the plants aged between 2 to 6 weeks and increased between 6 to 8 weeks after seeding. Both LN and DS increased linearly with increasing inoculum concentration, wetness duration, and temperature. Both LN and DS also increased with plant age between 2 to 4 weeks and decreased between 4 to 8 weeks. The growth stage and temperature required for optimal disease development ranged, respectively, from 4 to 6 weeks and 20 to 24°C when plants were inoculated at a concentration of 4 × 104 conidia/ml and provided with a wetness period of 24 h. Generally, cv. Indianhead and line 458-57 had significantly longer IP and LP and lower LN and DS than cv. Eston.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".