MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2031279122 · doi:10.1002/mop.22665

A novel switchable lowpass filter constructed with electromagnetic bandgap and illumination‐sensitive cadmium sulfide

2007· article· en· W2031279122 on OpenAlexaff
Jack Wu, S. N. Qiu, C. X. Qiu, I. Shih

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrowave and Optical Technology Letters · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsCIS ScientificMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStopbandMaterials scienceMicrowaveInsertion lossOptoelectronicsBand gapCadmium sulfidePerforationElectrical conductorOpticsFilter (signal processing)Electrical engineeringPhysicsTelecommunicationsComposite materialEngineeringResonator

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A novel construction of microwave switchable lowpass filter based on electromagnetic bandgap (EBG) and cadmium sulfide (CdS) thin film is proposed. Linearly tapered slot‐array EBG structure is well known for its exceptional stopband ability and compact physical size. When the illumination‐sensitive CdS thin film is deposited on the perforations of the EBG structure, the stopband phenomenon induced by tapered slot‐array can be controlled by optical means. Innovative “conductive islands” were introduced to reside in the center of each perforation in order to enhance the optical switching. It has been demonstrated in both simulation and experimental measurement that the transmission coefficient is switched from 31.3 to 5.6 dB at 13 GHz when the gap width between the conductive island and the perforation is 30 μm. As the gap width decreases, the insertion loss can be reduced. Simulation result indicates that the insertion loss can be improved to around 1 dB at 13 GHz when the gap width is decreased to 5 μm. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microwave Opt Technol Lett 49: 2238–2242, 2007; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/mop.22665

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.141
Threshold uncertainty score0.973

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.172
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrowave and Optical Technology LettersSame topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207