MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2031299896 · doi:10.1080/07011784.2013.803742

Designing fish-passable riffles as gradient controls in Canadian streams

2013· article· en· W2031299896 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
R. W. Newbury

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Canadian institutionsBC Hydro (Canada)
FundersSimon Fraser University
KeywordsRiffleChannelizedSTREAMSChannel (broadcasting)Hydrology (agriculture)GeologyStream restorationHabitatFish <Actinopterygii>ConfluenceGeomorphologyFisheryEcologyGeotechnical engineeringBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fish-passable rock riffles are widely used to ease fish passage at road crossings and dams and to restore pool and riffle habitats in channelized streams. Pools, runs and riffles are created by breaking the uniform hydraulic gradient of channelized streams into relatively mild, shallow and steeply sloping segments. Riffle height is governed by the stage of the upstream pool required to pass the channel design flood or to backflood a fish passage structure. Riffles are mildly v-shaped to extend the flow across the channel or constrict the width to create a central torrent that will maintain a deeper downstream pool. The riffles may be closely spaced to create stepped pool channels or spread apart to divide the spacing into runs and pools typical of meandering channels. Four cases of riffle, pool and run dimensions are discussed with illustrative projects in walleye, salmon and trout streams. These projects, undertaken in the last three decades, illustrate their long-term stability and improvement in fish habitat. The projects are in four physiographic settings to emphasize the need for site-specific surveys peculiar to inherited post-glacial river channels and valleys in Canada.Les radiers de roches sont largement utilisés pour faciliter le passage des poissons aux traversées routières et aux barrages et pour restaurer les habitats calmes et troubles dans les cours d’eau canalisés. Des fosses, des passages et des radiers sont crées en divisant le gradient hydraulique uniforme des cours d’eau canalisés en segments relativement peu inclinés, peu profonds et abrupts (fortement inclinés). La hauteur du radier est dictée par le niveau de la fosse en amont nécessaire au passage de la crue nominale ou nécessaire pour inonder par reflux un ouvrage de passe à poissons. Les radiers sont conçus légèrement en forme de V pour étendre le débit d’un bout à l’autre du chenal, ou encore leur largeur est réduite afin de créer un torrent central qui assurera le maintien d’une fosse plus profonde en aval. Les radiers peuvent être étroitement espacés pour créer des chenaux en escalier ou ils peuvent être distancés afin de diviser l’espacement en passages et en fosses propres aux chenaux à méandres. Quatre cas de radiers, de fosses et de passages de différentes dimensions sont abordés à l’aide de projets d’illustration dans des cours d’eau abritant des dorés jaunes, des saumons et des truites. Ces projets ont été entrepris au cours des trois dernières décennies de manière à illustrer leur stabilité à long terme et l’amélioration de l’habitat du poisson. Ils sont exécutés dans quatre milieux physiographiques afin de mettre en évidence le besoin d’études propres au site portant spécifiquement sur les vallées et les chenaux fluviaux hérités de la période postglaciaire au Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.430
Threshold uncertainty score0.865

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2013
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriquesSame topicHydrology and Sediment Transport ProcessesFrench-language works237,207