MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2031308894 · doi:10.1118/1.2244699

Sci‐Sat AM (2) Therapy‐03: Characterization of Intermediate Energy X‐Ray Photons (0.2–1.0 MeV) for stereotactic radiosurgery: experimental demonstration of reduced radiological penumbra

2006· article· en· W2031308894 on OpenAlexaff
Bowen E. Keller, Lauren O'Malley, D Beachey, J Presutti, Jean‐Philippe Pignol

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPenumbraLinear particle acceleratorRadiosurgeryPhysicsMonte Carlo methodCyberknifeNuclear medicineIonization chamberX-rayPhotonOpticsBeam (structure)IonizationRadiation therapyMedicineRadiologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Stereotactic radiosurgery is used to treat intracranial lesions with a high degree of accuracy. At the present time, x‐ray energies at or above Co‐60 gamma rays are used. We hypothesize that intermediate energy x‐ray photons (IEP's), combined with small field sizes, produce a reduced radiological penumbra leading to a sharper dose gradient. The purpose of this work is three‐fold: 1.) to produce IEP's using a medical linear accelerator 2.) to characterize the x‐ray energy 3.) to demonstrate reduced radiological penumbra for IEP's compared to 6MV x‐rays. Materials & Methods: A Siemens linear accelerator was modified to produce IEP's. PDD versus depth measurements were done in solid water using a Markus parallel plate ionization chamber (PTW Freiburg) at SSD=100cm for a 2×2cm2 field size. Monte Carlo computer simulations were done using MCNP‐4C. A penumbra measurement device was constructed to examine radiological penumbra for various photon energies, field sizes and depths. Film (Gafchromic EBT) was used to record field edge profiles. These films were scanned using a digital microscope (spatial resolution of 1.87 microns/pixel). Film irradiations were done using SSD=100cm, depth= 2cm, FS=1.1cm2. Results: For the IEP's, PDD values were 55.4%(surface), 62.6%(5cm), and 34.7%(10cm). Monte Carlo simulations suggest a nominal x‐ray energy of 800kV. The 80%–20% penumbra widths were 2.10mm (6MV) and 0.345mm (IEP's). Conclusions: A novel intermediate energy x‐ray beam (800kV) has been produced using a linear accelerator. There is more than a 5‐fold reduction in radiological penumbra for the IEP's versus 6MV x‐rays for the small field size examined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical Physics→Same topicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques→French-language works237,207→