The endothelin system and its role in acute myocardial infarction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Immediately after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or in models of ischemia-reperfusion injury, cardiac endothelin (ET) system is markedly activated, and plasma levels of ET are increased. In the heart, expression of the main components of the ET system (ET-1 peptide, both receptor subtypes ETA and ETB, though not endothelin converting enzyme) are increased both at the gene level and protein level, in the viable myocardium, and--even more substantially--in the necrotic area. Despite these conspicuous abnormalities, the role of ET in this setting remains unclear. In the absence of human data, most short-term studies in animals (in terms of hours to up to 8 days post-AMI) and in the reperfused ischemic heart, have found beneficial effects of ET receptor blockade on survival rate, incidence of arrhythmias, cardiac function, and morphology. In contrast, many studies in which a long-term ET inhibition was started immediately post-infarction and the late effects were examined in animals with ensuing chronic heart failure (14-100 days postinfarction), adverse effects were also observed, such as scar thinning, further ventricular dilation, or even a worse survival rate. It appears that the ET system plays a dual role during the early post-AMI period. At present, it is not clear whether the short-term beneficial effects or long-term adverse effects of ET receptor blockade would prevail. Acute use of short-acting ET receptor antagonists in patients with AMI complicated by an acute heart failure is an attractive possibility that also remains to be investigated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".