Longterm Effects of Endothelin Receptor Antagonism on Microvascular Damage Evaluated by Nailfold Capillaroscopic Analysis in Systemic Sclerosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is characterized by microvascular injury, fibrosis, and hypoxia of involved tissues. The vasoactive peptide endothelin-1 (ET-1) seems to be implicated in these events. Using nailfold videocapillaroscopy (NVC), we evaluated longterm effects of ET-1 antagonist treatment on nailfold microvascular damage in patients with SSc, over a 3-year followup period. METHODS: Thirty patients with SSc (mean age 64 ± 5 yrs, mean disease duration 8 ± 1 yrs) were recruited during their programmed standard treatment protocols. At baseline (T0), 15 patients with SSc (mean age 63 ± 15 yrs, mean disease duration 7 ± 3 yrs), already receiving cyclic intravenous infusion of iloprost (5 continuous days, average 80 μg/day, every 3 mo), continued the treatment for a further 3 years (ILO group). The remaining 15 patients with SSc (mean age 68 ± 13 yrs, mean disease duration 8 ± 4 yrs), although they continued the same cyclic intravenous iloprost treatment as the previous group, also received bosentan 125 mg twice a day for 3 years (ILO+BOS group). Qualitative analysis (scleroderma patterns) and semiquantitative scoring of the microvascular damage were performed by validated routine NVC methods. RESULTS: During followup, a statistically significant increase of capillary number was observed in the ILO+BOS group (p < 0.02), with a significant and progressive increase of angiogenesis (p < 0.01). In contrast, the ILO group showed a statistically significant decrease of capillary number (p < 0.05). After 3 years the number of capillaries was significantly higher in the ILO+BOS group than in the ILO group (p < 0.05). The score for giant capillaries decreased significantly in both groups of patients with SSc (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In this open study, longterm treatment with ET-1 receptor antagonist in combination with iloprost was found to interfere with progression of nailfold microvascular damage in patients with SSc, as assessed by NVC over a 3-year followup period.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".