Evaluation of an Interchangeability Switch in Patients Treated With Clozapine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To report the findings of a switch from brand-name to generic clozapine in a Canadian outpatient population. METHOD: The medical records of 58 outpatients diagnosed with schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders and stabilized on brand-name clozapine therapy were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were switched from brand-name to generic clozapine on their next dispensing supply after September 29, 2003. Data regarding clozapine dose regimens, physicians' visits, hospitalizations, and adverse events were collected from the patients' charts for the 6 months preceding and the 6 months after the switch from brand-name to generic clozapine. Relevant measurement changes in those data associated with the switch are evaluated. RESULTS: No significant changes in dose, number of physician's visits, or hospitalization rates were observed as a consequence of the switch from brand-name to generic clozapine. In addition, there were no reported increases in the frequency of the most common adverse events, including decreases in white blood cell counts. None of the patients received a "nonrechallengeable" status, and no discontinuation of clozapine therapy occurred for any reason (toxicity or treatment failure) in the 6 months after the formulation switch. CONCLUSION: In the current outpatient population, retrospective evaluation of the conversion from brand-name clozapine to the first generic alternative available on the Canadian market did not reveal any significant treatment changes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".