Proton Inventory Study of the Base-Catalyzed Hydrolysis of Formamide. Consideration of the Nucleophilic and General Base Mechanisms
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An NMR study of the rates of hydroxide-promoted hydrolysis of formamide in aqueous media of varying mole fraction D(2)O (n) was performed at [LO(-)] = 1.42 M, T = 25 degrees C, to shed light on whether the mechanism involves a nucleophilic attack of HO(-) on the C=O or HO(-) acting as a general base to remove a proton from an attacking water. The solvent deuterium kinetic isotope effect under these conditions is inverse, k(OH)/k(OD) = 0.77 +/- 0.02 or k(OD)/k(OH) = 1.30 +/- 0.03. Proton inventory analysis of the k(n)() versus n data was undertaken through NLLSQ fits to equations representing four possible mechanisms encompassing nucleophilic and general base ones with waters of solvation on the attacking hydroxide, and with or without waters of solvation on the developing amide hydrate oxyanion. Both nucleophilic and general base mechanisms can be accommodated, but there are restraints on each that are discussed. The preferred mechanism is a nucleophilic one proceeding through a transition state having two solvating waters remaining on the attacking hydroxide and three additional waters attached to the developing amide hydrate oxyanion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it