The Results of Nonoperative Treatment for Three- and Four-Part Fractures of the Proximal Humerus in Low-Demand Patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of nonoperative treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in patients who refused surgery or could not undergo surgery because of medical conditions. DESIGN: Retrospective evaluation of prospective collected data. SETTING: Educational and research hospital. Level IV, therapeutic case series. PATIENTS: Eighteen patients (eight three- and 10 four-part fractures) were included. The mean age was 68.2 ± 13.8 years (range, 39-90 years). The mean follow-up was 39.1 ± 12.4 months (range, 24-60 months). Patients were grouped into two: Group A being younger than 65 years and Group B 65 years or older. INTERVENTION: Standardized nonoperative treatment and follow-up protocols were used. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Functional and radiographic assessments were performed in posttreatment first year and at latest follow-up. Constant-Murley scores were also obtained for both shoulders. RESULTS: The mean Constant-Murley score was 61.3 ± 13.5 (range, 40-85) at latest follow-up. Osteonecrosis was detected in five patients. All patients had significantly lower SF-36 scores for all subscales except mental health than the normal Turkish population. There was no significant difference between three- and four-part fractures regarding age and Constant-Murley scores. The mean Constant-Murley score of the Group A patients with three-part fractures was significantly higher when compared with the Group A patients with four-part fractures. There was no significant difference between patients with and without osteonecrosis regarding fracture types or the Constant-Murley scores at the latest follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Although the individual fracture type does not have an influence on functional results, these results are better in patients younger than 65 years with three-part fractures. The results of the nonoperative treatment of these fractures are satisfactory even in elderly patients. The radiographic appearances did not correspond with the functional results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".