MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2031387060 · doi:10.2118/165423-ms

Coupled Geomechanical and Thermal Simulation of SAGD Process

2013· article· en· W2031387060 on OpenAlexafffund
Xiaolin Bao, Zhangxin Chen, Chao Dong, Hui Deng, Hongchen Liu, Han Zhong

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Heavy Oil Conference-Canada · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta Innovates - Technology Futures
KeywordsGeomechanicsSteam injectionReservoir simulationPetroleum engineeringPermeability (electromagnetism)PorosityConstitutive equationPore water pressureStress (linguistics)MechanicsGeotechnical engineeringEnhanced oil recoveryGeologyFinite element methodEngineeringStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract SAGD (steam assisted gravity drainage) is a coupled geomechanical problem because continuous steam injection changes reservoir pore pressure and temperature, which can alter the effective stress in-situ, resulting in the dynamic changing of porosity and permeability. A conventional modeling approach remains difficult in capturing the Flow-Stress interactions, as well as in modeling surface deformation during injection and production. Therefore, to optimize SAGD operating strategy and minimize the environmental risk, a coupled geomechanical simulation that solves the flow and stress equations simultaneously is the solution. In addition, thief zone SAGD performance is very sensitive to the high injection pressure, which may cause the great heat loss due to steam breakthrough into thief zones. Flow-stress coupling (STARS+Geomechanics) using a modular coupled approach is investigated in this paper. The iterative coupling between the thermal simulator and stress model has the advantage of flexibility and computational efficiency, where pressure and temperature changes occurring in the reservoir simulator are passed to the geomechanical simulator to compute the changing of stress and strain, and update porosity and permeability simultaneously. A generalized hyperbolic constitutive model for oil sands that approximates the dominant mechanism is implemented; the failure envelope is defined by a Mohr-Coulomb relation controlled by the friction angle. Coupled geomechanical simulation results demonstrate the permeability enahncement and surface heave, caused by dilation and thermal expansion, associated with the steam injection. A control volume and K-value based multiphase multicomponent thermal simulator (FATS) is utilized aiming to investigate the detrimental effect of thief zones (top water and top gas). Results have been validated by STARS, demonstrating that the steam chamber has been shifted into thief zones after steam breakthrough under high injection pressure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Heavy Oil Conference-CanadaSame topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir AnalysisFrench-language works237,207